Inline and optimize ContourLabeler.get_label_coords. #19018
Merged
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
get_label_coords
is clearly an internal helper tolocate_label
; e.g.the
distances
parameter needs to be filled in with a very specificarray that's internally computed by
locate_label
. Inline it, whichalso makes clearer the possibility to save some further computation for
locate_label
to return a linearized index (the part that was commented"There must be a more efficient way..."; indeed converting the array to
a list of tuples to get back the index seems pretty inefficient).
Also better document the implementation of
get_label_coords
(I'm notactually changing any of the code logic).
PR Summary
PR Checklist
pytest
passes).flake8
on changed files to check).flake8-docstrings
and runflake8 --docstring-convention=all
).doc/users/next_whats_new/
(follow instructions in README.rst there).doc/api/next_api_changes/
(follow instructions in README.rst there).