-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.6k
[TypeInfo] Reuse CollectionType::mergeCollectionValueTypes
for ConstFetchNode
#61014
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 7.3
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
norkunas
commented
Jul 1, 2025
Q | A |
---|---|
Branch? | 7.3 |
Bug fix? | no |
New feature? | no |
Deprecations? | no |
Issues | #60820 (comment) |
License | MIT |
yield [Type::null(), DummyWithConstants::class.'::DUMMY_NULL_*']; | ||
yield [Type::array(), DummyWithConstants::class.'::DUMMY_ARRAY_*']; | ||
yield [Type::array(null, Type::union(Type::int(), Type::string())), DummyWithConstants::class.'::DUMMY_ARRAY_*']; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yield [Type::array(null, Type::union(Type::int(), Type::string())), DummyWithConstants::class.'::DUMMY_ARRAY_*']; | |
yield [Type::array(key: Type::union(Type::int(), Type::string())), DummyWithConstants::class.'::DUMMY_ARRAY_*']; |
Is a bit more explicit to me 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i was done like that before, but something popped in my mind that symfony does not use named params 🤷♂️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
named parameters are not covered by our BC promise (except in attribute constructors). And we want our tests to use our API covered by BC guarantees, as it allows to catch mistakes where we break BC (if we have to update tests, it is a good indication that something changed that might not be intended).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, then you can keep null
!
yield [Type::true(), DummyWithConstants::class.'::DUMMY_TRUE_*']; | ||
yield [Type::false(), DummyWithConstants::class.'::DUMMY_FALSE_*']; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This needs to be backported to 7.2 IMO.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, will do that afterwards :)