-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.2k
[Messenger] Add new messenger:stats
command that return a list of transports with their "to be processed" message count.
#17322
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
messenger.rst
Outdated
# or specific transport(s) only | ||
$ php bin/console messenger:stats my_transport_name other_transport_name | ||
|
||
This command won't work if the configured transport's receiver does not implement |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I would add it inside a note docblock, wdyt?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, why not? I also took the liberty of adding the note docblock at the end of the section 'Limit Consuming to Specific Queues' because I think we need one too (because the 2 sentences are similar). What do you think?
Knowing the number of messages in the "queue" for transport(s) | ||
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | ||
|
||
If you want to know how many messages are in the "queues", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Begin with a version added directive for version 6.2
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, I had forgotten
…ransports with their "to be processed" message count.
d7cceea
to
6d84eef
Compare
Thanks Maxime for this contribution ... and thanks to reviewers too. |
Fixes #17085