Skip to content

feat(eslint-plugin): [thenable-in-promise-aggregators] add rule #10163

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

abrahamguo
Copy link
Contributor

PR Checklist

Overview

Resurrection of @Tjstretchalot's work in #8094 .

@typescript-eslint
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for the PR, @abrahamguo!

typescript-eslint is a 100% community driven project, and we are incredibly grateful that you are contributing to that community.

The core maintainers work on this in their personal time, so please understand that it may not be possible for them to review your work immediately.

Thanks again!


🙏 Please, if you or your company is finding typescript-eslint valuable, help us sustain the project by sponsoring it transparently on https://opencollective.com/typescript-eslint.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Oct 17, 2024

Deploy Preview for typescript-eslint ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 15f08c2
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/typescript-eslint/deploys/6711064d36030b000834aae5
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-10163--typescript-eslint.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.
Lighthouse
Lighthouse
1 paths audited
Performance: 98 (🟢 up 7 from production)
Accessibility: 100 (no change from production)
Best Practices: 92 (no change from production)
SEO: 90 (no change from production)
PWA: 80 (no change from production)
View the detailed breakdown and full score reports

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

@kirkwaiblinger
Copy link
Member

Hi, just leaving a quick comment, no time for a review, but now that this is being revisited I think we should use this opportunity to incorporate it into await-thenable. See #8094 (review), #8858 (comment).

@JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link
Member

JoshuaKGoldberg commented Nov 4, 2024

Marking as draft pending being changed up per #10163 (comment). cc @abrahamguo 👋

@JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link
Member

@abrahamguo @kirkwaiblinger just checking in, what should be done here?

@kirkwaiblinger
Copy link
Member

Well, #10282 was also attempting to tackle this but went stale... I'd say - if you want to continue this @abrahamguo then go for it! Otherwise if there isn't activity on this for a bit we may want to close it out as stale as well until someone has bandwidth to carry the torch.

@kirkwaiblinger kirkwaiblinger added the stale PRs or Issues that are at risk of being or have been closed due to inactivity for a prolonged period label May 30, 2025
@kirkwaiblinger
Copy link
Member

Closing this as stale, since it hasn't had an activity in several months. But feel free to reopen if you do have time to work on it! To any other contributors coming along, if you choose to base work off of this and/or #8094 and/or #10282, please give a co-author attribution to the author(s) thereof.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 7, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
stale PRs or Issues that are at risk of being or have been closed due to inactivity for a prolonged period
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[await-thenable] warn against passing non-promise values to promise aggregators (Promise.all, Promise.allSettled, Promise.race)
4 participants