-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 929
fix: remove unique constraint on OAuth2 provider app names #18669
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
ThomasK33
wants to merge
1
commit into
thomask33/06-27-docs_refactor_claude.md_to_use_import_system_and_comprehensive_workflows
Choose a base branch
from
thomask33/06-30-feat_oauth2_remove_unique_constraint_on_app_names_for_rfc_7591_compliance
base: thomask33/06-27-docs_refactor_claude.md_to_use_import_system_and_comprehensive_workflows
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+7
−27
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Jun 30, 2025
This was referenced Jun 30, 2025
4efb07a
to
8a3f7a9
Compare
58b076d
to
88f01e4
Compare
@ThomasK33 tests seem unhappy 😔 |
Yeah, I forgot to update them. On it. |
8a3f7a9
to
e7d56c2
Compare
88f01e4
to
0d042a4
Compare
e7d56c2
to
10701da
Compare
0d042a4
to
f4614fd
Compare
a2607a8
to
990f706
Compare
f4614fd
to
5943be1
Compare
990f706
to
95c0496
Compare
5943be1
to
2e85437
Compare
2e85437
to
aa379a5
Compare
…liance Change-Id: Iae7a1a06546fbc8de541a52e291f8a4510d57e8a Signed-off-by: Thomas Kosiewski <tk@coder.com>
95c0496
to
b17d907
Compare
johnstcn
approved these changes
Jul 1, 2025
Comment on lines
-138
to
-146
// Generate an application for testing name conflicts. | ||
req := codersdk.PostOAuth2ProviderAppRequest{ | ||
Name: "taken", | ||
CallbackURL: "http://coder.com", | ||
} | ||
//nolint:gocritic // OAauth2 app management requires owner permission. | ||
_, err := client.PostOAuth2ProviderApp(ctx, req) | ||
require.NoError(t, err) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should validate that multiple OAuth2 apps can have the same name.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Remove unique constraint on OAuth2 provider app names
This PR removes the unique constraint on the
name
field in theoauth2_provider_apps
table to comply with RFC 7591, which only requires unique client IDs, not unique client names.Changes include:
Change-Id: Iae7a1a06546fbc8de541a52e291f8a4510d57e8a
Signed-off-by: Thomas Kosiewski tk@coder.com